I'm wanting to effectively fully 'automate' the layout under PC control using a suitable software application, hence the reason for this post. I'm 'into' electronics and am reasonably comfortable using Microchip PIC chips, and more recently, various ARDUINO modules, in fact I have more or less stopped using PIC's now as the Arduino's are far more versatile and convenient. I'm in the process of building an initial End To End '00' shunting test layout, to 'play' with to to get some experience with before (hopefully) progressing to a more ambitious larger layout. I have successfully been able to 'setup' the Tower Controller using JMRI Decoder Pro. I am relatively new to DCC, I have a Digitrax DCS200 system with an RR Circuits LocoBuffer and also an RR circuits Tower Controller (64 I/O interface). John On Behalf Sent: zaterdag 8 augustus 2020 7:29 To: Subject: Newbie to DCC - which way to go. Even when this other train has been operated manuallyīut You can create wat you like & complex IF you like !.If this is also the case on your side of the water, this explains something I guess.ĭrivng autmatical a route and will not crash/ interfear with other trains. In my club (ca.80 members), I found nobody who likes programming ! Like, are been able to program RRA for (in my case) semi-automatic driving. Ī very few people who playing with trains, ( modelrailroad) Living on the other side of the water (Netherlands) and I’am a PLC programmer. Sorry for my first long Post, and would appreciate any comments, suggestions etc. I feel that there may be a lot more users than there are forum members. Also, if there are any 'members/users' in the UK, especially in the Staffordshire area. What I am wondering about is the what seems to be the lack of members in this forum, only 24 at the moment, and whether the RRA project is still 'active' and being supported, developed etc. It does seem an excellent option as it does have what appears to be more accessibility for creating the automation that I suds-ectopic I will want, I have programmed in VB6 in the past, and a little on VB.net, so the scripting does not phase me at the moment. i have done a little research into a few available packages, both 'free' and 'paid for', including Freiwald Train Controller (MegaBucks !), Bessos iTrain (reasonable cost), and also the free JMRI Panel Pro and ROCRAIL offering's, and have been looking closely at RailRoadAutomation for a while. i'm 'into' electronics and am reasonably comfortable using Microchip PIC chips, and more recently, various ARDUINO modules, in fact I have more or less stopped using PIC's now as the Arduino's are far more versatile and convenient. In case, I misunderstand the addressing, how would the bit representation for the CANID 114, be for Tx1 and Tx1?Hello, I am relatively new to DCC, I have a Digitrax DCS200 system with an RR Circuits LocoBuffer and also an RR circuits Tower Controller (64 I/O interface). In case the above is correct, the function can_tx() in file can_send.c also has to be corrected. net/~rocrail- hardware- team/rocrail- hardware/ trunk/view/ head:/cbus/ cangc3/ cancmd. I have been debugging the code in MPLAB, here is what I see:Ĭancmd.c ( bazaar. I agree that this bug is only cosmetic, but please have a look at the code below - and have in mind that it could be me that does not understand the addressing scheme on the CANBUS. Since when you read the wiki pages for the CAN-GC3, CAN-GC1e they have a fixed CANID of 114 and 11, respectively. The only issue is the "wrong" listing of CANID in rocail.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |